|
|
-
-
|
David Austin jr. talking about this rose (in Bunny Guiness youTube : ‚David Austin Junior‘s Fantastic Garden with Great tips on roses‘ ; july 2024) from min. 9.38 to about 11.06:
this is a lovely rose; it is a scottish rose; very thorny; supposed to be very hardy; one of the last roses that my father was really excited about; I nearly named it after him, but , I didn‘t , because this very good rose might probably get a little bit of disease- so for David Austin jr. it lacked absolut perfection; it has beautiful large flower; the foliage is old, airy (in comparison to dense foliage like Eustacia Vye has; we love that about this rose; we are always looking for that in our roses if we can get it, because in theory air movement should keep the disease away ;
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
I was very impressed by this rose in online videos and here the fragrance is rated as 'very strong' but Tantau who sell the rose only give it a 2star for fragrance ?
|
REPLY
|
|
My Artemis is in its fourth year, three years cut down very low for good branching. It has sun from about 1 p.m. until evening - its head can see the sky, the shade comes from a house.
For me there is scent, but I really have to put my nose right into the bud. (comparison : the scent intenstity would be the same as for Garden of Roses / Joie de vivre; whereas other roses for me have strong scent: e. g. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe / Pure Poetry; Stephens‘ Big Purple; Munstead Wood, Scepter’d Isle; …)
(The colour for me is creamwhite with a mixture of yellow (like the yellow colour of an artifical vanilla custard). Especially the closed buds and the inner of an opened flower show that yellowish / vanilla colour. So this vanilla - cream - white is seen from bud to flower until it shatters.)
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
Dear Jedmar,
concerning Stanwell perpetual:
If it is not an obvious fault than it is 100% my missunderstanding.
I am new to roses.
I read a lot in a rose talk and i thought that there they talked about that rose and there they stated several times , that if a rose is perpetual, constantly blooming then this is the one.
But again, if you are sure that it is occasionallly flowering I am wrong.
Excuse me please!
Best regards!
|
REPLY
|
-
-
|
Dear roselovers, dear help me find administrator ,
I think in description of
Rosa spinosissima Stanwell Perpetual the status „occasional repeat“ should be corrected!?
By the way, I am new to roses and I love this information provided.
Thanks so much , and some day I will find out how to donate from abroad (Germany)
Best regards
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
28 DEC by
 jedmar
|
Warum? Die Nachblüte ist doch sporadisch.
|
REPLY
|
|
