|
Recent Questions, Answers and Comments
-
-
Initial post
yesterday by
HubertG
I wonder whether this might be the original 'Lady Mary Fitzwilliam'. The foliage, flowers and plentiful hips seem to be a match. Or maybe one of her closer descendants?
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 2 posted
yesterday by
Lee H.
That’s an exciting proposition. LMF is such an important rose, and deserves a better fate than extinction. If I had access to both, I’d want to cross her with ‘Dr. Grill’, and see if something approximating ‘Antoine Rivoire’ would result. Because science, you know? :-)
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 2 posted
yesterday by
Patricia Routley
Contributions from members on the average height of “Bishop’s Lodge Mary Mathews” might help. The original ‘Lady Mary Fitzwilliam’ was low.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
yesterday by
Hamanasu
I ordered a very cheap root-bagged ‘Sutter’s Gold’ from a low-end online garden centre in the early spring. This variety has been unavailable anywhere in the UK for years, since Beales dropped it from its catalogue alongside many other earlier hybrid teas, and it seemed too good to be true to have found such an unlikely source for it… well, it was too good to be true. After a little research I established the rose is ‘Simply the best’. I have disposed of it, because, with very limited growing space available, I am very particular about the roses I grow; and this variety (although it does seem capable of producing the occasional sumptuous, more refined looking bloom) in many pictures has the neither-fish-nor-flesh form I don’t really care for (neither highly structured with reflexing petals, nor soft and loose). The scent, however, made it difficult to bring myself to throw the plant out. It is absolutely delicious, neither fruity nor tea, nor damask, but sweet and musky in the manner of Hanne, Golden Jubilee, and DA’s Buttercup, but also stronger than any of these.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
yesterday by
Cavallo
Color seems unlikely.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
yesterday by
Kim Rupert
Blue Moon is lavender. This rose, while very lovely, is definitely not lavender but pink.
|
REPLY
|
|