HelpMeFind Roses, Clematis and Peonies
Roses, Clematis and Peonies
and everything gardening related.
Search PostsPosts By CategoryRecent Posts 
Questions, Answers and Comments by Category
Discussion id : 168-332
most recent 29 AUG HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 29 AUG by Margaret Furness
Rose Annual 1960, pp. 16-19, The International Code of Nomenclature.
I note that there was no prohibition of tacky/sleazy names, but given the (wryly amusing) disregard now evident of other aspects, it wouldn't make any difference.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 1 posted 29 AUG by jedmar
This seems to have been constructed for American registrars, for whom foreign names were an anathema. See Art. 37 b: I wonder what the undesirable connotations of the French translation of Golden Lady are! And to call 'Danse du Feu' 'Spectacular' is immoral????
REPLY
Discussion id : 123-529
most recent 23 OCT 20 HIDE POSTS
 
Discussion id : 114-788
most recent 6 JAN 19 HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 6 JAN 19 by Marnix
I discovered a nice Rosesite with descriptions and photo's. On facebook I did see a Picture of 'Scholle's Gelbe Moosrose', a plant I did not know before. Then I got a link from another facebookmember to a Rosesite that was new for me. On HMF I discovered a nurserie so I have already ordered an exemplar of that Yellow Mossed Rose. I think it is worth to let People know about that Rosesite here, so that's why I write this comment.

http://roses.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Scholles_Gelbe_Moosrose?fbclid=IwAR1SibUh1zFIH2Wic-3_YFCqhSXdT2epEf0N6bjcd4Q6xRG7kxspWFGtrmw
REPLY
Discussion id : 92-103
most recent 14 APR 16 HIDE POSTS
 
Initial post 14 APR 16 by Give me caffeine
Although in general the Gardening Australia magazine is a good publication, I just received the latest issue (May 2016) and noticed some rather odd inclusions.

In one of their usual rose articles for this time of year they claimed that Mutabilis is a "modern shrub rose". I thought they really should know better than that, so made sure of it.

They were also claiming that Crépuscule is a "modern shrub rose", so I set them straight on that too.

Then they recommended Mermaid as a docile and easy to train climber that was ideal for screening a garage. I pointed out that although wonderful in the right spot, Mermaid was not only likely to eat the garage and then start on the house, but is possibly one of the least trainable roses ever invented and is notorious for being equipped with teeth that would terrify a great white shark, and that perhaps they should mention this before recommending it to beginners.

Will be interesting to see how they respond.
REPLY
Reply #1 of 2 posted 14 APR 16 by Margaret Furness
Re Mermaid: what masterly understatement!
REPLY
Reply #2 of 2 posted 14 APR 16 by Give me caffeine
In my own personal notes on Mermaid (when I was making notes on lotsa roses) I wrote "Leaps tall buildings in a single bound. Descended from Godzilla crossed with a triffid on methedrine".
REPLY
© 2024 HelpMeFind.com