|
-
PhotoDiscussion id : 115-331
-
Initial post
12 FEB 19 by
jedmar
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
12 FEB 19 by
Hortus
Korrektur erledigt. Danke für den Hinweis. Hortus
|
REPLY
|
-
-
In response to Hortus who has commented elsewhere: Since the breeder has not named this rose, I use " Weiße von Saxdorf " only as a working name.
Think of ‘Weiße von Saxdorf’ as a temporary synonym. As it is a bred rose, it does not carry the “double quotes” of a foundling rose. If ever Mr. Bethke does name it, we can then set ‘Weiße von Saxdorf‘ aside in favour of its permanent name.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 1 posted
17 DEC 18 by
Hortus
Thanks for the supplement. Unfortunately, Mr. Bethke died in 2018.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
15 DEC 18 by
Hortus
Rose Listing Omission
" Weiße von Saxdorf"
This unnamed Rambler rose was created by Hans-Peter Bethke in Saxdorf (Germany) before 2006. It is a once-blooming rose of the Wichurana type. Flower color white to pale pink; 5 petals. Foliage small and shiny with 5-9 segments. She is very disease resistant, and tough. Growth height up to 250 cm Forms rosehips. It was used as a paternal part of ´Pfarrgarten Saxdorf'.
|
REPLY
|
Thank you Hortus. ‘Weiße von Saxdorf’ added and your photos moved to that file. We’ve also added it as the pollen parent of ´Pfarrgarten Saxdorf‘
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 4 posted
16 DEC 18 by
Hortus
Thanks. Since the breeder has not named this rose, I use " Weiße von Saxdorf " only as a working name.
|
REPLY
|
I will reply further in the rose’s file.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#4 of 4 posted
16 DEC 18 by
Hortus
Thanks for the supplement. Unfortunately, Mr. Bethke died in 2018.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Initial post
28 DEC 17 by
Hortus
Parentage : Rosa beggeriana Schrenk x Rosa fedtschenkoana Regel http://www.catalogueoflife.org/col/details/species/id/af61e6957b0c5fa54e8dc928cf5fdb20
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 3 posted
29 DEC 17 by
jedmar
The parentage we listed is taken from the original publication in "Flora of Russia". It is not clear why Catalogue of Life changed the pollen parent.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#2 of 3 posted
29 DEC 17 by
Hortus
In verschiedenen jüngeren Veröffentlichungen findet man die von mir genannte Parentage, so in - "Vascular Plants of Russia and Adjacent States (the Former USSR)" - einer Veröffentlichung des Botanischen Gartens Moskau - in der Web-Seite von Plantarium.
Various recent publications include the Parentage I mentioned, so-called - "Vascular Plants of Russia and Adjacent States (the Shaper USSR)" - a publication of the Moscow Botanical Garden- on the Plantarium website.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#3 of 3 posted
30 DEC 17 by
jedmar
Das kann schon sein. Es ist aber üblich, dass wenn ein anderer Botaniker später eine Zuordnung macht, diese z.B. als Rosa x piptocalyx (Juz.) xxxxx beschrieben wird, um darzustellen, dass es wohl auf den ursprünglichen Text von Juzepczuk basiert, aber verändert ist. Das ist hier nicht der Fall. Rosa fedtschenkoana ist natürlich Teil des Rosa webbiana-Komplexes, jedoch sollte man eine Erklärung erwarten, warum man von Flora of Russia abweicht. Ich mache eine entsprechnede Notiz, bis weitere Informationen gefunden werden.
|
REPLY
|
|