|
-
-
Light pink flowers with 9-16 petals? I think this photo is wrong . Even if I compare with the one in Sangerhausen.
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Another scentless mauve? How did the always-fragrant color class suddenly become so scentless in this decade?
|
REPLY
|
They call it progress! lol
|
REPLY
|
Actual photo of a red rose bouquet from Year 2073:
davidflemingsite.com/images/site_graphics/38891251-brick2.jpg
|
REPLY
|
Great vase life for sure! =)
|
REPLY
|
Listed as very fragrant for its earthy aroma.
|
REPLY
|
Fragrant, for sure. ;) Even with this it was a need to plant. :)
|
REPLY
|
-
-
Frosthart, even at temperatures of -25 ° C no damage. Early flowering, with a (for me) rather spicy scent. Good repeated flowering. And I see a strong influence of Spinossima. Also look at the thorns and leaves...
|
REPLY
|
-
-
The color of the flowers and the shape of the leaves do not fit.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#1 of 5 posted
14 MAY 11 by
Jay-Jay
See my earlier comment and reply on Agnes, 3-6 days ago.
|
REPLY
|
Thank you, Jay-Jay. Yes, I am pretty much sure I've got the right rose (not mislabeled). In my heavy red clay many roses are showing rather unusual colors. My 'Agnes' is right without the doubt - later blooms were yellowish. I don't know what Andreas. L. meant by leaves being wrong. Whatever... I am always open for other's opinions... If it is a mislabeled plant, I will delete my photos from HMF.
|
REPLY
|
Any this is exactly how we find out - collecting the insight and expertise of people from all over the world. It's great to see when HMF is used like this.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#4 of 5 posted
14 MAY 11 by
Jay-Jay
That's okay Marina, I was just wondering and would be pleased if my Agnes would show that variation in colours too! Maybe You should wait with deleting the photos, until there is more information from Patricia Routley and maybe other HMF visitors/members.
|
REPLY
|
Reply
#5 of 5 posted
7 JAN 13 by
Jay-Jay
Look at: http://www.helpmefind.com/gardening/l.php?l=2.80.0&tab=32 The last comments and photo's.
|
REPLY
|
|