|
|
One or more site guests believe this photo is incorrectly labeled or inaccurate !
-
-
|
This looks photoshopped for more red.
|
REPLY
|
|
This is the first (2008) photo of 'Double Delight' that Bruce contributed. It is of interest to look at his subsequent photos of this rose:
099691. 2008, Feb
136056. 2009, Oct
136055. 2009, Dec
138565. 2010, Jan
211602. 2010, Oct
211603. 2010, Oct
|
REPLY
|
|
She was a beauty, for me, I don't see the point of photo shopping anything, because we are about what our gardens produce, not our IT skills (not that I have any). I can't explain it, except the red was that intense, that camera took that luminous color, which the bloom was. The same camera has taken all the rose photo's I've submitted, so I guess blame nature, if anyone.
Yours faithfully
Bruce Martin
|
REPLY
|
|
Was this the post you were looking for tropicalthought?
|
REPLY
|
|
